How might a baby boom in sweden create a financial burden for the government?
it would necessitate new schools, classrooms, and resources for children.
it would lead to costly forced sterilization policies.
it would further promote gender equality, which would mean increased costs for educating girls.
it would result in a large elderly population and a large young population, leaving only a small percentage of the middle-aged population contributing to the economy.
managing the colonial war effort while also forcing for and moving towards america's independence was the major agenda of the debate in course at the second continental congress. the delegates at the congress also adopted the united states declaration of independence, in so doing acting as the ''de facto'' national government of what later became the united states of america
the ancient greeks were known as great thinkers for their scientific and technological advances, philosophy, achievements in the arts/literature, cartography, and politics.
in science and medicine they had contributions such as the wheelbarrow, hippocrates “the father of medicine’s” description of medical diseases and conditions, and aristotle’s studies of the solar system. the great philosophical thinkers socrates, plato, and aristotle are still studied in the modern-day to make sense of the world in a non-religious way influencing many western cultures.
answer; //it is discrimination to treat you unfairly compared to someone else,because of religion,race or
precedent, in the given question, refers to a legal case that establishes how cases of a similar nature in the future should be handled based on the results from the judicial court. generally, precedent is followed in most cases, even when the technology has changed, or circumstances are different from the precedent – as long as the underlying principles are the same.
in this case, the best answer to the question would be (c) when there are changes in the factual circumstances from those in which the precedent was established, the precedent can no longer be used since it means that the two cases now have different underlying principles.